← Hub
S

ELRA & Biliary Stent Knowledge Base USA Only

Sales Rep Field Reference — v1.0 (Updated 2026-07-23) — 🧠 Learning AI
INTERNAL

Why ELRA + Biliary Stent Matters for 2026

The IR bundle (ELRA + biliary stent + drainage) is the core growth driver for STARMED America's transformation from a thyroid-focused sales org to a full distribution platform.

The IR Bundle Explained

STARMED's IR bundle combines three complementary product lines for biliary intervention:

  • ELRA electrode — endobiliary RFA to ablate tumor tissue causing strictures (pre-stent)
  • Niti-S biliary stent — self-expanding nitinol metal stent for post-ablation drainage
  • Biliary drainage — percutaneous biliary drainage catheters for access and decompression

Clinical workflow: RFA first → stent placement → sustained patency. ELRA thermal ablation reduces tumor ingrowth, improving stent patency vs. stent alone.

Source: Biliary Obstruction Management (2026 Kickoff Day 2); Biliary Training Rev.3

Biliary Stent Business Development Roadmap

STARMED's 3-phase market entry strategy for biliary metal stents in the US IR market:

Phase Company Objective What's Expected from Sales Reps
Phase 1 — Market Foundation
(Day 1–60)
Validate market demand, build clinical knowledge base, and collect competitive intelligence. External clinical education consultant (Danny Kim, 1099) supports field training and market data collection on a daily-rate basis. Learn stent product specs and clinical workflows. Share field observations and competitive intel with HQ. Attend training sessions led by clinical consultant.
Phase 2 — Customer Penetration
(Day 61–180)
Introduce biliary stents to ALL existing IR customers who already use ELRA. Clinical consultant provides joint case support and physician education during initial introductions. Lead stent conversations with your existing ELRA accounts. Coordinate with clinical consultant for case support when needed. Report customer feedback and adoption barriers.
Phase 3 — Market Expansion
(Month 7+)
Expand stent business to new non-customer IR facilities. Sales team operates independently. Clinical consultant available for complex cases on request. Independently prospect and close new IR accounts for stents. Leverage Phase 1–2 learnings and clinical evidence. Request clinical support only for complex or high-value cases.

Current progress: Phase 1 (Education & Setup) and Phase 2 (Messaging) are complete. Now in Phase 3 — securing customer touchpoints and hospital access.

Compliance note: External clinical consultants are engaged for clinical education and workflow optimization ONLY. No sales responsibility, no pricing discussions, no influence on purchasing decisions. All physician interactions must be at the request of clinical staff.
Source: STARMED Biliary Stent Go-to-Market Strategy; Danny Kim Consulting Report (2026); Henry strategic direction (3.17.2026)

Target Customer Sequencing

Phase Target Rationale
Phase 1 ELRA-using IR or close-relationship IR Warm intro, existing trust
Phase 2 ALL existing STARmed IR customers Leverage installed base, cross-sell
Phase 3 Non-customer IR doing biliary intervention New market expansion
Source: Biliary Stent Business USA (Henry, EN, 3.17.2026)

ELRA — Endoluminal Radiofrequency Ablation Electrode

FDA clearedBipolar7Fr catheter

Flexible bipolar RF catheter for temperature-controlled endobiliary ablation. FDA 510(k) indication: "partial or complete ablation of tissue in the pancreatic and biliary tracts" (21 CFR 878.4400).

⚠ Clinical note: Although the 510(k) language includes "pancreatic," ELRA is used exclusively in the biliary tract in clinical practice. The pancreatic duct should NOT be targeted β€” pancreatic duct ablation carries significant risk. All education and sales materials should reference biliary tract use only.

Key Features

  • Temperature sensing — 80°C ablation zone with real-time feedback
  • Impedance monitoring via VIVA combo generator
  • Slim 7Fr with silicone tapered tip — navigates difficult anatomy
  • Bipolar design — no grounding pads required (standard for endobiliary RFA)
  • 4 sizes available — based on treatment location
Source: ELRA IR Brochure 2024; ELRA&EUSRA Guide

ELRA Sizing Guide

Code Exposure Best for Settings Ablation depth Ablation width
7-2B11S 11mm Hilar* 7W / 2 min ≈2mm ≈8mm
7-4B18S 18mm Hilar* 7W / 2 min ≈2mm ≈15mm
7-2B22S 22mm CBD* 10W / 2 min ≈3.5mm ≈14mm
7-4B33S 33mm CBD* 10W / 2 min ≈3mm ≈27mm

Smaller sizes for hilar (thin walls, high vascularity). Larger for CBD (thicker tissue). Standard temp: 75-80°C.

Source: ELRA IR Brochure; Biliary Training Rev.3 §7

VIVA Combo RF Generator Compatibility

  • Same VIVA combo used for Star thyroid electrodes
  • Power range: 5–200W (ELRA uses 7–10W)
  • Auto-adjusts wattage to maintain target temperature
  • No additional capital purchase if facility already has VIVA combo
Sales tip: For existing VIVA combo customers, ELRA is a zero-capital-cost expansion — consumable electrode only. This is the strongest upsell argument.
Source: ELRA Setup Guide; Training 20250326

ELRA Setup Checklist

  • Connect ELRA electrode to VIVA combo RF Generator
  • Set temperature: 75–80°C; power 7–10W per sizing guide
  • Set timer: 2-minute ablation cycle
  • Verify impedance before ablation start
  • Position electrode under fluoroscopy/US guidance
  • After ablation: balloon sweep to remove residual tissue
Source: ELRA Setup Guide; Training Rev.3

ELRA Probe Selection Guide (from Danny Kim Q&A)

When to use 18mm probe

  • Long strictures (e.g. 4cm): Divide into 3–4 overlapping segments, ablate sequentially
  • Post-surgical or clip-adjacent anatomy: Shallow ~2mm depth limits thermal spread — preferred near surgical clips
  • Standard settings: 7W, 75°C, 2 minutes per segment
  • Expected ablation zone: Length ~18mm (±1-2mm), Diameter ~6-7mm, Depth ~2mm

When to use 22mm / 33mm probes

  • Best for straight, non-surgical bile ducts not near metal or critical structures
  • Deeper ablation zone (3–3.5mm) — reduces number of treatment segments
  • Example: long distal CBD stricture without prior biliary surgery
  • In post-surgical or clip-adjacent anatomy, prefer 18mm for better control

Sequential (back-to-back) ablation

  • Multiple segments in one session are common and safe
  • Key tip: Allow 5–10 seconds between segments for tissue to settle before the next ablation cycle, ensuring uniform ablation zones
  • Can be performed after balloon dilation — RFA adds thermal remodeling to mechanical disruption

Guiding sheath sizing

  • ELRA catheter (7Fr) → use 8Fr guiding sheath (always 1Fr larger)
  • Stent delivery (8Fr) → use 9Fr guiding sheath
  • Guidewire: 0.035" stiff/supportive, 145–150cm — provides best trackability without being cumbersome
Source: Q&A Assessment & Role-play Scenarios (Danny Kim, 2026)

ELRA Technical Deep-Dive — Manufacturer Q&A

R&D verifiedMust-know

Why You Must Follow the Recommended Power Settings

Think of ELRA like a toaster oven with a thermostat. The system is designed to heat tissue to exactly 80°C — no more. The recommended wattage settings make this possible:

Electrode Size Recommended Power Why This Specific Wattage
11mm, 18mm 7W Smaller electrodes need less energy to reach target temperature
22mm, 33mm 10W Larger electrodes need more energy to heat a bigger area
Never exceed recommended wattage. Higher watts cause temperature to spike too fast — the thermostat (Temperature Mode) can't keep up, and the system loses its precise temperature control. This defeats ELRA's key safety advantage over competitors.

How Temperature Mode Actually Works

When the physician starts ELRA, here's what happens inside the system:

  • Step 1: RF energy is delivered at the set wattage
  • Step 2: Temperature sensor monitors tissue temperature in real-time
  • Step 3: Once target temperature (75–80°C) is reached, the system automatically adjusts power up and down to maintain it — like cruise control in a car
  • Step 4: After exactly 2 minutes, the system automatically shuts off
Key safety feature: If the electrode doesn't reach the target temperature within 25 seconds of starting, the system automatically shuts off. This protects against situations where the electrode isn't making good contact with tissue (e.g., the stricture is too wide). If this happens, reposition the electrode and try again.
If the physician manually stops mid-ablation: The timer resets to zero. They need to note how much time elapsed before stopping, because the system won't remember it. This matters if they want to complete the remaining time.

Why 2 Minutes Is the Sweet Spot — Not More

Manufacturer testing (ex-vivo) showed:

  • At 2 minutes: Optimal ablation depth achieved (~2mm)
  • After 2 minutes: Minimal additional depth gain — diminishing returns
  • After 3 minutes: Tissue carbonization (charring) begins — this is bad because carbonized tissue acts as an insulator, blocks further energy delivery, and can cause tissue to stick to the electrode

Bottom line: 2 minutes is not arbitrary — it's the scientifically validated sweet spot.

Repeat Ablation at the Same Spot — Does It Go Deeper?

No. Manufacturer testing confirmed that ablating the same exact spot twice does NOT significantly increase depth. However, overlapping segments (moving the electrode slightly to cover adjacent areas) is both safe and standard clinical practice for treating long strictures.

Which Electrode Size for Curved Hilar Anatomy?

The electrode tip is made of metal — it's the one part that's stiff, not flexible. In the hilum where bile ducts curve sharply:

  • 22mm or 33mm electrodes → too stiff for curves → the electrode presses against one wall, creating uneven ablation
  • 11mm electrode → short enough to navigate curves → even ablation on all sides
Rule of thumb: For hilar (curved) anatomy, always recommend the 11mm electrode, even if it means doing multiple passes. Multiple short passes > one long uneven pass.

When the Stricture Is Mild (Not Very Tight)

ELRA needs good contact between the electrode and the duct wall to work properly. If the stricture is mild and the duct is relatively open:

  • The electrode won't press firmly against tissue → poor contact
  • Temperature rises very slowly or not at all
  • The 25-second auto-shutoff will trigger before reaching target temperature

This is not a product failure — it means the stricture may not need ablation, or a smaller electrode might achieve better contact.

Ablation Inside an Occluded (Blocked) Stent

When a previously placed stent gets blocked by tumor growing into it, ELRA can be used to ablate the tumor INSIDE the stent. This is called "intra-stent ablation." Critical rules:

  • Use 11mm electrode — minimizes chance of touching the metal stent mesh
  • The electrode must NOT touch the stent — this is the #1 rule

What happens if the electrode touches the stent:

Contact Type What Happens What to Do
Full contact (all electrode touches stent) System auto-shuts off (safety feature) Reposition electrode slightly, try again
Partial contact (some electrode touches stent) Impedance rises rapidly — system does NOT auto-stop Physician must manually stop RF output immediately, then reposition
Sales insight: Partial contact is the trickier scenario. Make sure physicians know to watch impedance readings closely during intra-stent ablation.
Source: ELRA Intraductal RFA Q&A (Manufacturer Technical Document, 2026-06-16)

ELRA Safety — Hilar Anatomy Warning

SafetyCritical

The Right Hepatic Duct runs very close to the Hepatic Artery (a major blood vessel). When performing ELRA ablation in the right intrahepatic duct near the hilum:

  • Extra caution is required due to arterial proximity
  • Use the 11mm electrode for better control
  • Temperature-controlled ablation provides a safety margin, but the physician should be aware of this anatomical relationship
For the sales rep: You don't need to bring this up proactively. But if a physician mentions concern about ablating near the hilum, acknowledge it as a valid consideration and note that the temperature control and short electrode (11mm) provide safety advantages in this area.
Source: ELRA Intraductal RFA Q&A (Manufacturer, 2026-06-16)

ELRA Regulatory & Logistics Reference

510(k)Logistics

FDA Clearance Chain

510(k) #DatePurpose
K163450β€”VIVA combo RF Generator clearance
K181758β€”Original ELRA Electrode clearance
K233113Oct 25, 2023Shelf-life extension: 1 year β†’ 3 years

Classification: 21 CFR 876.4300 β€” Endoscopic Electrosurgical Unit and Accessories, Product Code KNS, Class II. Indication: "partial or complete ablation of tissue in the pancreatic and biliary tracts."

3-Year Shelf Life β€” Sales Advantage

ELRA shelf life was extended from 1 year to 3 years (confirmed via K233113, real-time aging data). This significantly improves distributor stocking flexibility and reduces expiration-related waste. When discussing inventory with hospitals: "You can stock ELRA without worrying about rapid expiration β€” 3-year shelf life means minimal waste."

Model Naming Convention Decoded

Part #72 or 4B11/18/22/33S or L
Meaning7 French# electrode pairsBipolarTip exposure (mm)Short (40cm, percutaneous) / Long (175cm, endoscopic)

STARMED America sells S (percutaneous) models only. L (endoscopic) models are Taewoong USA territory.

Patient Population

Adult patients (over 22 years). ELRA must NOT be used with other manufacturers' RF generators β€” VIVA combo only.

Source: K233113 510(k) Summary; ELRA User Manual ST-UM-29E(US) Rev.1

ELRA Ablation Volume Data (Ex-Vivo)

SpecsReference

Manufacturer bench testing (ex-vivo bovine liver, 23.6Β°C, 27% humidity):

Tip (mm)ElectrodesPowerTimeAblation WidthAblation LengthVolume
1127W2 min7.9mm13.2mm0.44 mL
22210W2 min8.0mm22.7mm0.78 mL
1847W2 min5.9mm16.9mm0.35 mL
33410W2 min7.0mm25.9mm0.62 mL

Lesion-to-Electrode Selection Guide

Lesion SizeRecommended ModelAblation Length
~9mm (Β±1mm)7-2B11S13.2mm
~16mm (Β±1mm)7-4B18S22.7mm
~19mm (Β±1mm)7-2B22S16.9mm
~26mm (Β±1mm)7-4B33S25.9mm

Clinical results may differ from ex-vivo data. For lesions exceeding electrode ablation length, perform overlapping ablations β€” start proximal (away from Ampulla), progress distally.

Source: ELRA User Manual ST-UM-29E(US) Rev.1; K233113 510(k) Summary

ELRA Contraindications & Key Warnings

SafetyCompliance

Contraindications (from User Manual)

  • Patients with electronic implants (pacemakers, defibrillators) β€” consult cardiologist before use
  • Use near flammable anesthetics or oxidizing gases (Nβ‚‚O, Oβ‚‚) or volatile solvents
  • Do NOT activate when not in contact with target tissue (capacitive coupling risk)

Required Equipment

  • Fluoroscopy β€” required for ALL ELRA procedures (percutaneous and endoscopic)
  • Guidewire β€” max outer diameter 0.035 inch
  • Protective eyewear and filtration masks (electrosurgical byproducts)
  • Smoke evacuation system recommended

Post-RFA Adverse Effects (for physician awareness)

Abdominal pain, fever, nausea, headache, right shoulder joint pain, chest discomfort. Delayed bleeding and recurrence of cancer are also listed risks.

Source: ELRA User Manual ST-UM-29E(US) Rev.1
US AVAILABLE

Niti-S D Biliary Stent — Primary U.S. Sales Product

The Niti-S D-type is STARMED America's primary biliary stent for the U.S. market. This is the stent you are selling.

Product image placeholder: Actual Niti-S D-type stent photo to be added. Key visual features: Hook & Cross dual nitinol wire mesh, radiopaque markers at both ends + center, 8Fr delivery system.

Key Features — Why D-type Wins

  • Two nitinol wires, "Hook and Cross" structure — superior conformability in tortuous bile ducts
  • Low foreshortening (<20%) — critical for accurate placement; stent stays where you put it
  • Immediate wall opposition — conforms to duct shape instantly after deployment
  • Radiopaque markers — 3 at both ends + 2 in middle for precise fluoroscopic positioning

Ordering Information

Approach Art Number Prefix Diameter Length Delivery
Endoscopic (ERCP) BD--** 6, 8, 10mm 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12cm 8Fr / 180cm
Percutaneous (IR) TD--** 6, 8, 10mm 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12cm 8Fr / 50cm
Key selling points:
• D-type conforms to tortuous anatomy where Boston Scientific Wallstent fails
• Published evidence: "NDS was very effective for maintaining patency in unresectable malignant hilar obstruction" (GIE 2009)
• Pair with ELRA for the full IR bundle at package pricing ($3,200 target)
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 60–61; GIE Vol 70, No.1 (2009); Niti-S Catalog

D-type Stent Selection Rules (from Danny Kim Q&A)

Diameter selection

Location Recommended Rationale
CHD / Hilar 8mm Reduces side-branch compression in the hilum
Distal CBD 10mm Larger lumen → longer patency; if IHD dilated → 10mm reduces migration risk

Covered vs. Uncovered

Location Type Rationale
Distal CBD Covered Ingrowth protection — no side-branches to preserve
CHD / Hilar Uncovered Preserves side-branch flow — essential at hilum

Stent length sizing rule

  • Stent = tumor length + 1cm margin on each side
  • Example: 3cm tumor → minimum 5cm → choose 6cm stent (next available size)
  • Margin accounts for tumor growth and edema over time

Why D-type (braided) is ideal for CHD/hilar

  • Low axial force — preserves natural anatomy and side-branch drainage
  • Uniform radial force — consistent expansion without straightening the duct
  • Laser-cut stents have very high radial force that can shift the landing zone

Deployment markers explained

  • 4 total radiopaque markers on delivery system: 3 on inner catheter (distal, mid, proximal) + 1 ring marker on outer sheath
  • Inner markers = final stent boundary positions
  • Outer ring marker = real-time deployment progress
  • Foreshortening note: Final deployed length = length printed on box (predictable)
Source: Q&A Assessment (Danny Kim, 2026)

Understanding SEMS Design — Braided vs. Laser-Cut

DesignDifferentiator

Braided SEMS (e.g., Niti-S D-type)

  • Wire mesh woven pattern
  • LOW axial force → excellent conformability
  • Foreshortening occurs but is PREDICTABLE
  • Uniform radial force along length

Laser-cut SEMS (e.g., some Wallflex)

  • Cut from single nitinol tube
  • ZERO foreshortening → precise length
  • BUT higher axial force can straighten tortuous ducts and shift landing zone
  • Sharp cell edges may accelerate tumor ingrowth
Why this matters for sales: D-type's braided design with Hook & Cross structure gives the optimal balance: conforms to anatomy while maintaining patency. This is the key differentiator vs. laser-cut competitors.

Covered vs. Uncovered failure modes

Type Primary failure mode Migration rate
Uncovered Tumor ingrowth through mesh (16–46%) Low (1–5%)
Fully covered Migration (up to 20%). Minimal ingrowth but overgrowth at stent ends still occurs. High (up to 20%)
Partially covered Compromise — lower migration than FC, lower ingrowth than UC Moderate
Source: Clinical Endoscopy 2023; GIE 2023 RCT

D-type Stent β€” Complete Technical Specifications

SpecsFDA

510(k) Clearance: K073667 (Nov 19, 2008)

Indication: Palliation of malignant strictures in the biliary tree. Prescription use only.

Physical Specifications (All Percutaneous TD-- Models)

DiameterLength (expanded)ForeshorteningCrossing ProfileUsable Length
8mm40–120mm23.5–28.6%2.7mm50cm
10mm40–120mm21.1–28.5%2.7mm50cm

Shorter stents have higher foreshortening %. Crossing profile 2.7mm is consistent across all sizes.

Article Number Convention

PrefixApproachFirst 2 digitsLast 2 digitsExample
TDPercutaneous (50cm)Diameter (08=8mm, 10=10mm)Length code (04=40mm...12=120mm)TD1008 = 10mm Γ— 80mm, percutaneous
BDEndoscopic (180cm)SameSameBD0806 = 8mm Γ— 60mm, endoscopic

STARMED America sells TD-- (percutaneous) only. BD-- sold by Taewoong USA.

Stent Size Selection Rule (from User Manual)

  • Select stent 20–40mm longer than measured stricture to fully cover both ends
  • Unconstrained stent diameter should be 1–4mm larger than largest reference target diameter

MRI Safety

MR Conditional at 1.5T and 3.0T. Max spatial field gradient: 30 T/m. Max whole-body SAR: 2 W/kg. Scan duration: 30 min continuous with 30 min off. May produce image artifact near stent.

Guidewire Requirements

  • Percutaneous: 0.035" (0.89mm), at least 180cm, stiff/extra-stiff preferred
  • Endoscopic: 0.035" (0.89mm), at least 450cm, stiff/extra-stiff preferred
Source: 510(k) K073667; User Manual UBU-01 Rev.8 (2026.01.15)

D-type Stent β€” Contraindications & Required Warnings

ComplianceSafety

Contraindications

  • Strictures that do not allow passage of a guidewire
  • Patients for whom endoscopic techniques are contraindicated
  • Patients with bleeding disorder or coagulopathy
  • Patients with ascites
  • Biliary obstruction preventing cholangiography

FDA-Required Labeling Warning

Required on ALL materials: "The safety and effectiveness of this device for use in the vascular system have not been established." Per FDA, this warning must appear prominently on pouch, box, carton, IFU, and promotional materials near the trade name.

Key Clinical Warnings

  • Stents cannot be repositioned after complete deployment
  • Chemoradiation may cause tumor shrinkage β†’ stent migration risk
  • Contains nickel β€” potential allergic reaction in nickel-sensitive patients
  • Do NOT use with Ethiodol or Lipiodol contrast media
  • Do NOT expose introducer to organic solvents (e.g., alcohol)
  • Full expansion may require 1–3 days post-deployment

Sterilization & Storage

Ethylene oxide (EO) sterilized. Single use only β€” do not resterilize or reuse. Store in dry, cool place away from sunlight.

Source: 510(k) K073667; User Manual UBU-01 Rev.8

2026 Pricing — Current Target Pricing

CONFIDENTIALInternal Only
Do NOT share pricing with physicians or hospital staff. All pricing discussions must go through authorized sales channels only. This information is for internal reference.
Product List Price Target Price Discount
Biliary Stent (Niti-S) $2,500 $2,150 14%
ELRA Electrode $2,400 $1,750 27%
Package (Stent + ELRA) $4,900 $3,200 35%
Package strategy: The bundle discount ($3,200 vs $3,900 individual targets) incentivizes physicians to adopt both products together. Always lead with the package when possible.

Note: Market is still being researched. Pricing subject to adjustment as market data is collected during Danny's Phase 1.

Source: Internal pricing memo to Miae (2026); market still under research

Revenue Per Procedure Potential

$3,200
Package (ELRA + Stent)
$1,750
ELRA alone (target)
$2,150
Stent alone (target)

Stents are consumables — once you build an account, they reorder regularly. Focus on building relationships now; this is your future recurring income.

Message to reps: "Biliary stents are consumables — once you build an account, they reorder regularly. Stent introductions create ELRA cross-sell opportunities."
Source: Internal pricing; Danny Kim business strategy

Clinical Indications — When Percutaneous Metal Stenting Is Used

Indications

Core principle (SIR/CIRSE): drain obstructed/infected bile quickly and safely while preserving future treatment options. ERCP is first-line; percutaneous (PTC/PTBD) is used when endoscopy fails or is impossible.

1. Malignant Biliary Obstruction (MBO) — the primary indication

  • Unresectable/metastatic tumor causing obstruction: pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, metastases.
  • Goal: drain ≥50% of liver volume to lower bilirubin and enable chemotherapy.
  • Stent choice by prognosis: expected survival <4 months → plastic can be justified; >4–6 months → self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) for longer patency and fewer re-interventions.
  • Routine pre-op drainage of a resectable patient is not recommended (raises infection/complications) — limit to cholangitis, uncertain resectability, or planned neoadjuvant therapy.

2. Benign Biliary Strictures (BBS)

  • Post-cholecystectomy iatrogenic injury, post-transplant anastomotic stricture, PSC, chronic pancreatitis.
  • Historically metal stents were contraindicated (tissue ingrowth made them unremovable). Fully-Covered SEMS (FC-SEMS) now allow 6–12 months of remodeling then removal.

3. When percutaneous is required instead of ERCP

  • Altered GI anatomy (Roux-en-Y, subtotal gastrectomy, Whipple) — scope cannot reach the ampulla.
  • Complex hilar malignancy (Bismuth-Corlette III/IV) — percutaneous technical success ~97.7%.
  • Failed ERCP wire passage → rendezvous procedure (+47541).
Relative contraindications: uncorrected coagulopathy (platelets <50k, INR >1.5), massive ascites blocking the tract, and non-dilated ducts (forced puncture risks major bleeding/bile leak).
Source: SIR/CIRSE Standards of Practice; ESGE; 6,214-patient meta-analysis; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §6

FDA Regulatory Status & Stent Types

Regulatory

All U.S. biliary stents clear FDA via 510(k) or De Novo. Historically metal stents were approved only for palliation of malignant strictures.

  • 2016 milestone: Boston Scientific WallFlex Biliary RX Fully Covered RMV passed De Novo DEN150040 — first U.S. metal stent approved to indwell up to 12 months for benign stricture due to chronic pancreatitis (study cohort n=127). FDA created a new Class II category "Metallic Biliary Stent System for Benign Strictures."
  • Label warning: not established for post-transplant anastomotic or post-surgical benign strictures (data insufficient).
TypeBehaviorBest use
Uncovered SEMSTissue ingrowth → higher re-occlusion but very low migrationHilar (preserves side branches)
Fully-Covered SEMSBlocks ingrowth 100%, but migrates more (flared ends/anchors mitigate); removableBenign stricture, bleeding tamponade
Partially-Covered SEMSCovered center + bare ends for anchoringHybrid balance
Source: FDA De Novo DEN150040; Federal Register 2016-16530; Boston Scientific; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §7

Clinical Rationale: RFA + Stent vs. Stent Alone

Published evidence

Endobiliary RFA prior to stent placement addresses the primary cause of stent failure — tumor ingrowth. ELRA thermal ablation at the stricture site:

  • Reduces tumor ingrowth into stent lumen
  • Improves stent patency duration
  • May extend overall survival in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma
  • Serves as rescue treatment for bilateral metal stent obstruction due to tumor ingrowth
Source: Sofi et al. GIE 2017; Narrative review 2023; Pilot study 2021

Biliary Anatomy & Disease Overview

Key anatomy (for physician conversations)

  • Right/Left Hepatic Duct → Common Hepatic Duct → Cystic Duct junction → Common Bile Duct → Ampulla of Vater → Duodenum
  • Pancreatic duct joins at ampulla

Malignant biliary obstruction causes

  • Cholangiocarcinoma — primary bile duct cancer; 45% at hilum (Klatskin tumor), 35% mid-duct, 20% distal
  • Pancreatic cancer — 75% in head/neck causing CBD compression; 4th most common cancer death
  • Ampullary carcinoma — blocks drainage at ampulla of Vater
  • Gallbladder carcinoma — extrinsic compression

Klatskin tumor classification (Bismuth)

  • Type I: below confluence | Type II: at confluence
  • Type IIIa/b: extends into R or L hepatic duct | Type IV: bilateral (unresectable)
Source: Training Rev.3 Slides 3–17 (196-slide comprehensive training)

Key Published Studies Using ELRA

Year Study Key Finding
2024 Propensity score–matched, hilar cholangiocarcinoma Temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA impact
2024 Comprehensive review, biliary tree ablation Status and comprehensive review
2023 Narrative review, survival Endobiliary RFA may improve survival
2022 Endobiliary and pancreatic RFA review Comprehensive biliary applications
2021 Bilateral stent obstruction rescue Feasibility and safety as rescue
2020 Temperature-controlled percutaneous Novel device for malignant strictures
2019 Multicenter prospective Safety of automatic temp-controlled RFA
2017 IGNITE-1 study New intraductal RFA for biliopancreatic tumors
Source: 10 papers in ELRA_Stent_KB/02_Clinical/

ELRA Safety Profile

  • Temperature-controlled at 80°C prevents over-ablation
  • Impedance monitoring: real-time feedback on tissue contact
  • Validated in swine models (2018 J Invest Surg; 2019)
  • Potential complications: perforation, pain, fever, nausea, delayed bleeding (rare)
Contraindication: Do not use on patients with pacemakers or active implants.
Regulatory note: The 510(k) intended use states "partial or complete ablation of tissue" β€” it does not specify malignant vs. benign. However, the vast majority of published clinical evidence and training materials focus on malignant biliary obstruction. Sales discussions should reference the FDA-cleared indication and published evidence only. Do not make claims beyond the cleared intended use.
Source: ELRA Brochure safety section; Training Rev.3 §11

Clinical Insights from Field Training (Danny Kim)

Drainage success indicator

  • After successful biliary drainage, bilirubin should drop from ~12 mg/dL to 3–5 mg/dL within 3–7 days
  • This is a practical benchmark to share with physicians when discussing drainage effectiveness

RFA + Stent: Evidence for physician conversations

  • Stent patency: RFA + stent improves patency vs. stent alone, especially in hilar CCA
  • Overall survival: Pooled data shows improved survival with RFA + stent
  • Safety: No significant increase in major complications with temperature-controlled systems (no perforation, no hemobilia in published series)
  • Complications to discuss: Main risks are biliary infection and pancreatitis — related to stasis and instrumentation, NOT ablation depth

Modern biliary management framing

"We're not past uncovered stents — we're past stent alone as the full strategy. Modern IR approach: Ablation + Uncovered stent + functional drainage planning."

Source: Q&A Assessment & Role-play Scenarios (Danny Kim, 2026)

Biliary Anatomy for IR — Expanded Reference

AnatomyIR planning

Normal biliary tree

  • Right Posterior Sectoral Duct + Right Anterior Sectoral Duct → Right Hepatic Duct (RHD)
  • Left hepatic duct drains segments II–IV
  • RHD + LHD → Common Hepatic Duct (CHD)
  • CHD + Cystic Duct → Common Bile Duct (CBD) → Ampulla of Vater → Duodenum

Key anatomic variants (13–19% of population)

  • Crossover anomaly: Right posterior duct crosses over to drain into left hepatic duct
  • Trifurcation pattern: 3 ducts join at confluence instead of the normal 2
  • Aberrant right posterior duct: Drains directly into CHD
Clinical significance: MRCP before IR intervention is essential to map variants. Variant anatomy affects percutaneous access planning and stent positioning.
Source: RadioGraphics 2008; AJR 2001 Anatomic Variants

Percutaneous Access: Right vs. Left Approach

IR techniqueAccess planning
Approach Details Indication
Right intercostal Most common. Operator hands away from fluoro field. Right lobe = most hepatic parenchyma. Standard — target right intrahepatic bile ducts
Left subxiphoid Preferred when ascites present (avoids peritoneal fluid). Target: left intrahepatic ducts via segment II/III. Ascites, left-sided obstruction
Transjugular (TIBS) Alternative for patients with severe ascites AND coagulopathy where transhepatic is contraindicated. Severe ascites + coagulopathy
Clinical tip: Always check for ascites and coagulopathy before choosing approach. Left subxiphoid is underutilized and can be safer in patients with moderate ascites.
Source: Thieme Seminars in IR 2018; PMC6837303

SEMS Material Science — What's Inside the Stent

MaterialsEngineering
Material Properties Examples
Nitinol Shape-memory ("super-elastic"), returns to form after flexing. Most common in modern SEMS. Niti-S (Taewoong), Wallflex (BS)
Stainless Steel Rigid, high radial force. Older technology. Wallstent (BS)
Elgiloy Cobalt-chromium alloy. High corrosion resistance. Some legacy stents
Platinol Platinum-tungsten alloy. High radiopacity. Wallflex variants

Manufacturing types

  • Braided type: Woven wire mesh → high conformability, but foreshortening 20–40%
  • Laser-cut type: Cut from tube → zero foreshortening, but higher axial force, may straighten duct

Mechanical forces

  • Axial force (AF) = straightening force on central axis → low AF = better conformability
  • Radial force (RF) = expanding force → high RF = better lumen dilation
  • D-type braided stent: low AF + uniform RF = ideal for tortuous/hilar anatomy
Source: Clinical Endoscopy 2023; PMC10565432; PMC10565435

Stent Patency Data — Published Evidence

EvidencePatency
  • Overall median SEMS patency: ~360 days (25-week patency 81%, 50-week 53%) — AJR 1997
  • Percutaneous uncovered SEMS: Occlusion rate 13.5%, weighted mean time to occlusion 83.9 days — Frontiers in Radiology 2025 systematic review (18 studies)
  • Novel dedicated hilar stent: 6-month patency 90.9%, 12-month 68.2%; median patency 165 days — PMC 2022

Factors worsening patency

  • Larger cancer size
  • Stones/sludge present at time of placement
  • Longer stent
  • Total bilirubin >2 mg/dL at 1 month post-placement
  • Cholangiocarcinoma patients had lower patency rates than other diagnoses
Source: AJR 1997; Frontiers Radiol 2025; PMC9516644; BMC Gastro 2023

RFA + Stent: Latest Meta-Analysis Evidence (2024)

Meta-analysisRCT

2024 meta-analysis: 9 RCTs, 750 patients (374 RFA+stent vs 376 stent only)

  • Overall survival: RFA+stent showed benefit specifically in cholangiocarcinoma patients
  • Stent patency: Similar at 3 months between groups; RFA did not significantly improve patency overall

Earlier meta-analysis (2023): 5 RCTs, 370 patients

  • Stent patency significantly better in RFA group
  • Trend toward improved survival with RFA + plastic stents
Safety note: Increased cholecystitis risk with RFA+stent — important to discuss with physicians.
Takeaway for sales: Evidence strongest for cholangiocarcinoma. Present RFA as potential survival benefit, not just patency improvement.
Source: PMC11010977 (2024); PubMed 39094769 (2024)

Expert Clinical Insights β€” ELRA Webinar Q&A

KOL opinionsWebinar

Key insights from ELRA webinar featuring Dr. Nageshwar Reddy, Dr. Jaehee Cho, and Dr. Terry Wong:

Stent Choice After RFA β€” Plastic vs. Metal

  • Dr. Reddy: Uses metal stents generally, but plastic stents for hilar strictures β€” advantage is you can repeat RFA after removing the plastic stent
  • Dr. Cho: Depends on patient condition β€” plastic for multiple-RFA candidates, metal for advanced disease patients with limited life expectancy
  • Radical view (Dr. Reddy): For patients living 3+ years who face repeated stent occlusion, consider using plastic stents with repeated changes + RFA rather than metal stents β€” "a total change in view"

RFA Interval Between Sessions

Dr. Cho: 2–3 months between sessions. After the first RFA, 2 months is recommended since stent occlusion occurs sooner after the initial session.

Hilar RFA Safety β€” Vessel Encasement

  • Portal vein encasement: Not a major problem β€” portal vein never comes to the RFA field (Dr. Reddy)
  • Hepatic artery (right intrahepatic duct): Very careful approach needed. Dr. Reddy uses intraductal ultrasound to check right hepatic artery anatomy
  • Complication data: Dr. Reddy reported 2 major hemobilia cases from right hepatic artery β€” both with Habib catheter, not ELRA

RFA for Benign Biliary Strictures

Expert consensus: NOT recommended. One paper from China applied biliary RFA to benign post-operative strictures, but perforation risk is very high. Dr. Reddy explicitly does not recommend this use.

Cholangioscopy + RFA

RFA is normally a blinded procedure. Standard nasal cholangioscope can accommodate the RFA catheter for direct visualization. However, the Spyglass scope CANNOT accommodate the RFA catheter. Some experience with percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTC) for RFA under direct visualization.

Cytokine Surge & Immunomodulation

Local cytokine surge observed in bile after RFA. Immunomodulation appears to work in addition to the coagulation/ablation effect in tissue. More study needed, but this may explain why RFA benefits extend beyond simple tumor debulking. (Dr. Reddy)

RFA Inside Occluded Metal Stent β€” No Plastic Stent Needed?

Study (Kadayifci A et al, Endoscopy 2016) showed good stent patency after RFA without placing a plastic stent inside. Next research step: compare plastic stenting vs. no stenting post-RFA since ablation quality may be sufficient alone. (Dr. Terry Wong)

Source: ELRA Webinar Q&A (Dr. Reddy, Dr. Cho, Dr. Wong)

IR Biliary Stenting: Step-by-Step

IR approach
Step 1: Pre-procedure Preparation
  • CT or MRCP to assess anatomy and plan approach
  • Position patient supine; prepare fluoroscopy + ultrasound
  • Conscious sedation (IV pethidine) + local anesthesia (intramuscular lidocaine)
  • Sterilize and drape puncture site (usually RUQ)
Step 2: Percutaneous Access
  • Puncture intrahepatic bile duct with 21G Chiba needle under fluoroscopy
  • Cholangiography to clarify extent of biliary dilatation
  • Insert 0.018" micro-guidewire through needle
  • Dilate puncture channel; exchange to 0.035" guidewire
Step 3: Catheterization and Dilation
  • Exchange needle for biliary catheter
  • Place external drain if necessary
  • Balloon dilation for tight strictures (4–10mm diameter, 4–8cm length)
  • Serial dilators; insert 6F–8F introducer sheath
Step 4: ELRA Ablation (pre-stent)
  • Advance ELRA electrode through sheath to stricture site
  • Position under fluoroscopy
  • Set VIVA combo: 75-80°C, 7-10W per electrode size
  • Ablate for 2-minute cycle; monitor impedance
  • Balloon sweep post-ablation to clear necrotic tissue
Step 5: Stent Deployment
  • Advance guidewire across stricture (into duodenum for distal CBD lesions; into RHD or LHD for hilar lesions)
  • Select stent: measure stricture length under fluoroscopy using radiopaque markers or catheter reference
  • Position Niti-S stent under fluoroscopy
  • Deploy; allow full expansion; balloon dilate if needed
  • Contrast to confirm patency
Step 6: Completion
  • Remove instruments; apply pressure for hemostasis
  • Final imaging check
  • Monitor for complications; schedule follow-up (CT, US, MRCP)
Source: Training Rev.3 §8-9; IR Stenting Guide (TaeWoong USA, 3.24.2025)

Procedural Tips (from Danny Kim Q&A)

Pre-dilation

  • Selective only — not routine. Pre-dilate only for very tight strictures.
  • Post-dilation ELRA is safe: balloon disrupts fibrotic ring mechanically, ELRA adds controlled thermal remodeling

Guidewire & sheath selection

  • Wire: 0.035" stiff/supportive, 145–150cm — best trackability, prevents catheter kinking
  • Sheath for ELRA (7Fr catheter): 8Fr | Sheath for stent delivery (8Fr): 9Fr
  • Rule: always size up guiding sheath by 1Fr vs. catheter OD

Post-RFA stenting

  • Stenting immediately after ELRA is safe — temperature-controlled RFA prevents overheating
  • Standard sequence: ELRA ablation → balloon sweep → stent deployment in same session

Hilar bilateral stenting strategy

  • Key: cover both ducts proportionally to lesion to reduce flow imbalance
  • Uncovered D-type preferred — preserves segmental flow and re-intervention access
  • Primary goal: preserve side-branch flow + secure main drainage

Re-occlusion management (modern approach)

  • Old: Balloon dilation ± plastic stent through metal stent (short-lived)
  • Current trend: Intra-stent ELRA ablation + re-stenting — debulks ingrowth tumor, then new uncovered stent
  • Meta-analyses: RFA+stent > stent alone for patency and survival in hilar CCA
Source: Q&A Assessment & Role-play Scenarios (Danny Kim, 2026)

Pre-Procedure Requirements & Contraindications

SafetySIR standards

Absolute contraindications

  • Irreversible coagulopathy (must correct INR ≤1.5, platelets ≥50,000)
  • Uncorrectable clopidogrel use
  • Massive ascites (consider transjugular approach or left-sided access instead)

Relative contraindications

  • Moderate ascites (perform paracentesis first; prefer left subxiphoid approach)
  • Altered surgical anatomy (Roux-en-Y) — actually an INDICATION for percutaneous over endoscopic approach

SIR Quality Thresholds (JVIR 2021)

Metric Threshold
Appropriate indication ≥95%
Major complication ceiling ≤10%
Severe major (sepsis, bleeding, death) ≤2.5%
Less severe (pain, prolonged admission) ≤20%
Source: JVIR 2021 SIR QI Standards

Unilateral vs. Bilateral Stenting — Hilar Decision

HilarDecision guide
Factor Unilateral Bilateral
Minimum drainage 25% liver volume can achieve clinical success Goal: ≥50% liver volume for optimal outcomes
Patency Shorter Longer (some studies)
Survival No significant difference (RCT, n=72) Association with longer median survival when >50% drained
Technique Single access, simpler Y-configuration or stent-in-stent, more complex
Complications Fewer access-related More access-related but potentially better drainage
Recommendation: For Bismuth I–II, unilateral usually sufficient. For Bismuth III–IV, bilateral preferred to drain ≥50% liver parenchyma.
Source: Abdom Radiol 2019 (RCT); AJR 2012; JVIR 2007

Post-Ablation Protocol — What Happens After ELRA

Critical sequenceMust-know

Rule #1: Always Place a Stent After ELRA — No Exceptions

After ELRA ablation, the treated tissue swells (called edema — think of it like how your skin puffs up after a burn). This swelling temporarily makes the stricture WORSE, not better. If no stent is placed:

  • The bile duct narrows further from swelling
  • Bile cannot drain → patient gets worse, not better
  • This is dangerous and defeats the purpose of the procedure
Never suggest ELRA alone without stenting. The standard protocol is ALWAYS: ELRA → debris cleanup → stent placement in the same session.

Stent Choice After ELRA: Plastic vs. Metal

Both plastic and metal stents can be placed after ELRA. The choice depends on the treatment plan:

Scenario Recommended Stent Why
Patient will need repeat RFA sessions (every ~2 months) Plastic stent Easy to remove and replace at each session. Metal stents are permanent and harder to work around.
Single/definitive procedure Metal stent (Niti-S) Longer patency, better long-term drainage. Our D-type is ideal.
Sales opportunity: If the physician plans repeat RFA → they'll need a new plastic stent each time (recurring revenue from ELRA electrodes). If single procedure → sell the ELRA + Niti-S package.

Guidewire Contact During Bilateral Procedures

In bilateral hilar stenting, there are often two guidewires in the bile duct at the same time — one in the left duct and one in the right. A common concern: "Will ELRA damage the other guidewire?"

Answer: No. Manufacturer ex-vivo testing confirmed:

  • ELRA electrode touching a guidewire during ablation causes no problems
  • Ablation quality remains normal
  • Guidewire insulation is not damaged
  • No adverse events in clinical use either

This means physicians can safely perform ELRA even with multiple wires in place — no need to remove the contralateral wire first.

Post-Ablation Balloon Sweep (Recommended, Not Required)

After ELRA ablation creates dead tissue (debris), it's recommended to sweep an 8mm balloon through the ablation zone before stent placement. This clears debris and gives a cleaner surface for the stent to sit on. It's not mandatory, but most experienced operators do it.

Source: ELRA Intraductal RFA Q&A (Manufacturer, 2026-06-16)

ELRA vs. Habib EndoHPB (EMcision) — Head-to-Head

Key RFA differentiator
Feature ELRA (STARmed) Habib EndoHPB
Design Bipolar Bipolar
Grounding pad Not required Not required
Temperature control Real-time 80°C No feedback
Ablation time Customizable 2-min cycles Fixed 90-sec
Sizes 4 (11/18/22/33mm) Single size
Generator VIVA combo (multi-use) No dedicated (third-party RF generators)
Source: Training 20250326 §12; Test Report ELRA vs HABIB

ELRA vs. Habib β€” Expert KOL Perspectives (Webinar)

KOL dataReal-world

Dr. Terry Wong's Experience

"ELRA advantage is the cut-off point β€” RFA cuts off at very high impedance (e.g., when touching metal stent), providing safety confidence." No experience with Habib to compare directly.

Dr. Jaehee Cho's Comparison

  • Habib is single-size (22mm only); ELRA has four sizes (11, 18, 22, 33mm)
  • RFA inside metal stent is difficult due to electric shunt β€” short 11mm ELRA probe reduces shunt rate
  • To avoid short circuit in metal stent: use the short RFA probe and do multiple ablations. Longer probes have higher chance of contacting the metal stent

Dr. Reddy's Safety Data

  • Reported 2 major hemobilia cases from right hepatic artery β€” both occurred with the Habib catheter
  • Uses intraductal ultrasound to check anatomy when ablating near the right intrahepatic duct
Sales takeaway: When a physician says they use Habib, cite three KOL-backed advantages: (1) ELRA's 4 sizes vs. Habib's single-size limits anatomical versatility, (2) the 11mm probe specifically reduces electric shunt risk inside metal stents, and (3) ELRA's impedance-based auto-cutoff provides an additional safety layer that Habib lacks.
Source: ELRA Webinar Q&A (Dr. Wong, Dr. Cho, Dr. Reddy)

Niti-S vs. Boston Scientific Stents

Key stent differentiator
Feature Niti-S (Taewoong) Wallstent (BS) Wallflex (BS)
Material Nitinol (shape memory) Stainless steel Platinol wire
Conformability D-type: Hook&Cross Closed-cell, rigid Better than Wallstent
Radiopacity Markers at ends + middle Halo technology Full-length
Reconstrainable Model-dependent Up to 87% Up to 80%
Delivery 7–8.5Fr 7.5–8Fr 8–8.5Fr
Product variety 8+ models (S/D/ComVi/LCD/Bumpy/GioBor/Kaffes/Nagi) 2 models 3 models
Hilar-specific LCD™ (6mm large cell) None None
Tortuous anatomy ComVi: 2.1% migration Wallstent: 17% migration
Sales positioning: Niti-S has 8+ specialized models for every clinical scenario vs. Boston's 2-3 generic options. LCD for hilar, ComVi for tortuous, Bumpy for benign — we have the right stent for every patient.
Source: Training Rev.3 Slides 136–160; Isayama study (Surg Endosc 2009)

Stent Complication Comparison

Early complications (all stents, ~5%)

Biliary infection (35%), pancreatitis (29%), bleeding (23%), perforation (6%), migration (3%), renal failure (3%)

Late complications — stent dysfunction

  • Plastic stents: 2x more frequent dysfunction; sludge occlusion
  • Uncovered SEMS: Tissue ingrowth (→ ELRA ablation can rescue)
  • Covered SEMS: Lower ingrowth but higher migration risk
  • ComVi advantage: Triple-layer reduces both ingrowth AND migration
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 38; ESGE Clinical Guideline (Endoscopy 2012)

Market Context — Stent Failure Modes by Type

Failure analysisPositioning
Failure Mode Uncovered SEMS Fully Covered SEMS Partially Covered SEMS
Tumor ingrowth 16–46% (primary cause) Minimal Low-moderate
Tumor overgrowth Moderate Problematic (at ends) Moderate
Migration 1–5% (rare) Up to 20% ~5%
Sludge/biofilm Common over time Less common Moderate
Net patency Shorter in some studies Longer in some meta-analyses Intermediate
Niti-S positioning: D-type uncovered is ideal for hilar (preserves side-branches, minimal migration). For distal CBD, covered options exist in the Taewoong portfolio. The full Niti-S range covers every clinical scenario.
Source: Oxford Academic Gastro Reports 2023; Medscape IR review

ELRA (Biliary RFA) — CPT Coding

Current as of 2024
CPT Code Description Category
47999 Unlisted procedure, biliary tract I

Unlike thyroid RFA (CPT 60660/60661 from Jan 2025), biliary RFA uses the unlisted code 47999:

  • Narrative notes required with claims
  • Case-by-case, payer-dependent reimbursement
  • Prior authorization typically required
Sales angle: Navigating unlisted codes can be challenging. Offer to help physicians connect with coding and billing resources to support prior authorization.
Source: 2024 Biliary RFA CPT Code Opinion (STARmed America)

Biliary Stent — Base CPT Codes (47538–47540)

Corrected 2026

The three percutaneous biliary metal stent placement codes are chosen by (1) access route — existing vs. new percutaneous puncture — and (2) whether a drainage catheter is left in place at the end. All three are bundled: they already include diagnostic cholangiography, fluoro/US imaging guidance, balloon dilation (cholangioplasty), catheter exchange/removal, and all radiological S&I.

CPTAccessDrainage catheter left?
47538Existing access (via prior PTBD tract)No — fully internalized
47539New percutaneous accessNo — fully internalized
47540New percutaneous accessYes — external or int/ext "safety drain"

47540 use case: stent placed via new puncture, but a safety drain is intentionally left across/near the stent due to sepsis risk, bleeding, or uncertain patency. Once bilirubin normalizes and a capping trial passes, the drain is removed later at a separate outpatient visit (CPT 47537). Do not bill 47537 separately when the catheter is removed as part of the same stent procedure — that is unbundling.

Source: AAPC CPT 47538/47539/47540; MD Clarity; MedLearn Biliary IR Coding; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §3.1

Add-on Codes (+47542 / +47543 / +47544)

Add-on

Add-on codes are billed in addition to a primary biliary code (47531–47541). They cannot be billed alone.

Add-onProcedureKey billing rule
+47542Balloon dilation (cholangioplasty) of duct/ampullaBillable only for a separate, different duct that did NOT get a stent. Dilation of the stented duct is bundled into 47538–47540.
+47543Endoluminal biopsy (brush or forceps)Once per session only, no matter how many specimens or ducts sampled.
+47544Removal of calculi / debrisMechanical basket, EHL, etc. Not billable if no stone/debris is actually present.

+47541 = rendezvous procedure (percutaneous access created so an endoscopist can complete the case). +47542 if billed with a stent code requires Modifier 59/XS to prove a separate anatomic site.

Source: AAPC CPT Assistant; Boston Scientific 2023 Quick Reference; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §3.3

Multiple Stents & Required Modifiers

NCCI

Billing rule for multiple stents = count anatomic sites treated, NOT the number of stents used.

  • Overlapping stents in the same duct (e.g. two stents to cover one long CBD lesion) → single lesion → bill 47538/47539/47540 once.
  • Separate strictures in right + left hepatic ducts (Y-stent / side-by-side, two access routes or two independent ducts) → bill the stent code twice, second one with Modifier 59 or XS (distinct/separate structure) to avoid auto-denial.
ModifierWhen to use
26 / TC26 = physician professional component (imaging + interpretation); TC = facility technical component (device, fluoro, nursing).
59 / XSDistinct procedural service / separate anatomic structure — multiple stents or a +47542 at a truly separate site.
51Multiple procedures same session; 1st paid 100%, subsequent reduced ~50% (MPPR).
25Significant, separately identifiable E&M on the same day as a minor (0-day global) procedure.
Source: CMS NCCI Policy Manual Ch.6; MD Clarity CPT 47538; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §3.2, §4

Reimbursement & Payment Landscape

2026 rates

Biliary metal stenting is a device-intensive service (device >30% of cost). Because of this, ASCs are reimbursed for the device portion at the same rate as hospital outpatient (OPPS), even though ASC rates are normally lower.

ItemFigure
CPT 47539 commercial payer national avg~$5,036–$7,022 (ASC range $1,442 CT → $8,087 TX)
CPT 47540 commercial payer national avg~$5,055–$7,128 (outlier up to ~$20,777 at a severity-adjusted TX facility)
2026 Medicare conversion factor$33.57 (QP / APM); non-QP $33.40
2026 PFS efficiency adjustment−2.5% to work RVU & intra-service time on nearly all procedures
Sales angle: Medicare RVU pressure is squeezing physician fees, but commercial payers still pay strong device-intensive rates in ASC/HOPD settings. Help facilities understand how to document and capture these codes correctly.

Figures are payer- and geography-dependent; always defer to the facility coding department for actual claims.

Source: PayerPrice 47539/47540 Fee Schedule 2026; CMS CY2026 PFS Final Rule (CMS-1832-F); SIR; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §5

Medical Necessity & Payer Policy

Coverage
  • Malignant biliary obstruction (jaundice palliation): established standard of care — approved with little dispute by most commercial payers (Aetna, Cigna, Highmark BCBS follow Medicare NCD/LCD).
  • Benign stricture / recurrent stones: payers require documented evidence that ERCP failed or is anatomically impossible, and the patient is a high surgical risk.
  • Biodegradable / bioresorbable stents: classified Experimental / Investigational (e.g. Aetna) — coverage restricted pending long-term data.
Source: Aetna CPB; CMS NCD 20.7 / LCD; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §5.3

ICD-10 Diagnosis & Procedure Codes

ICD-10
CodeMeaning / when used
K83.1Obstruction of bile duct — most common justification (stricture/stone/malignant compression)
Z96.89Presence of other functional implant — documents an existing biliary stent
Z46.5Encounter for fitting/adjustment of other GI appliance (external drain management)
T85.590AOther mechanical complication of bile duct prosthesis (occlusion/fracture/migration), initial encounter — justifies re-intervention
0F778DZ (PCS)Inpatient: dilation of common hepatic duct with intraluminal device (example)
Source: ICD10Data; AAPC; Boston Scientific Quick Reference; Gemini Deep Research (2026) §8

Common Objections & Responses

"We already use the Habib catheter"

Response: "Both are bipolar, but ELRA offers key advantages: 4 electrode sizes to match anatomy (Habib is single-size), real-time temperature feedback at 80Β°C (Habib has no temp control), and customizable 2-min cycles vs. fixed 90 seconds. If you already have a VIVA combo for thyroid, zero capital investment."

"Stent-only is sufficient"

Response: "Published data shows RFA + stent improves patency vs. stent alone. ELRA adds ~5-10 minutes for potential long-term benefit — fewer re-interventions for your patients."

"I don't do biliary RFA — that's GI"

Response: "The percutaneous approach is designed for IR workflow. You're already accessing the biliary system for drainage and stenting — ELRA adds a 5-minute ablation step using your existing generator."

"No capital budget for new equipment"

Response: "ELRA is a consumable that connects to your existing VIVA combo. Zero capital. Stents are also consumables — recurring orders once established."

"Reimbursement is unclear"

Response: "CPT 47999 (unlisted). We can help connect you with coding resources for payer-specific guidance and prior auth support. Many facilities are successfully collecting."

"Why Niti-S over Boston Scientific stents?"

Response: "We have 8+ specialized models — LCD for hilar tumors with large cells for easy re-intervention, ComVi triple-layer for low migration (2.1% vs 17% Wallstent), Bumpy for benign strictures. Boston offers 2-3 generic options. The right stent for every patient."

"The equipment is too expensive for us"

Response: "Does your facility already have a VIVA combo for thyroid? If so, ELRA works with the same generator — zero capital cost, consumable only. If not, we have equipment pricing programs that bundle generator cost with accessory commitments."

"We're not seeing enough biliary cases to justify this"

Response: "Stents are consumables — even 2-3 cases/month generates consistent recurring revenue for your department. And ELRA adds value to every biliary intervention you're already doing. Let's look at your current biliary caseload together."

"What about the pricing?"

Do NOT discuss pricing directly. Route all pricing inquiries through your Regional Manager. Internal target pricing exists but is confidential.

"I'm not comfortable with stents that have shortening"

Response: "Our shortening is predictable — the length on the box is the final deployed length. D-Type addresses laser-cut limitations: no sharp edges (which can accelerate tumor ingrowth), lower axial force, more stable positioning in CHD/hilar anatomy. Laser-cut stents have very high radial force that can straighten the duct and shift the landing zone."

"Which U.S. hospitals are currently using this stent?"

Response: "This stent is newly introduced in the U.S. market, so domestic adoption is just beginning. However, the same design has been used for over 20 years outside the U.S., and it's been widely used in GI endoscopy internationally. It's a well-established and clinically proven platform."

"Does RFA really change patency/survival, or is it just extra work?"

Response: "Pooled data shows RFA + stent improves overall survival and stent patency (especially hilar/CCA), without significantly increasing major complications with temperature-controlled systems. Many centers now view RFA as part of a more durable, oncologic-minded drainage strategy — not just extra work."

"Are we past the era of uncovered stents in the hilum?"

Response: "We're not past uncovered stents — we're past stent alone as the full strategy. Uncovered stents remain central for preserving segmental flow. What's new: combining with ELRA to delay ingrowth re-occlusion and reduce re-intervention burden. Modern approach: Ablation + Uncovered stent + functional drainage planning."
Source: Q&A Assessment & Role-play Scenarios (Danny Kim, 2026)

Advanced Scenarios — Complex Physician Conversations

Expert levelRole-play

These scenarios come up with experienced IR physicians. Understanding the concepts will help you hold your ground in sophisticated clinical discussions.

"My bilateral uncovered stents are occluded from ingrowth. I'll just push a plastic stent through."

Context: The physician has a Bismuth III hilar patient with previously placed bilateral uncovered metal stents. One side is now blocked because tumor grew through the mesh (ingrowth).

Response approach: Acknowledge this is common practice, then introduce the newer approach:

"That's been the traditional approach, doctor. But the current trend is moving from 'plastic-through-metal' to intra-stent ablation + re-stenting:
1. Use ELRA inside the occluded stent to destroy the ingrown tumor and clear sludge
2. Then place a new uncovered stent to restore drainage and maintain future re-access

Recent data shows this approach can extend time to re-occlusion and reduce how often the patient needs to come back, compared to plastic stent alone."

"For re-occlusion, are people still just doing balloon dilation + another stent?"

Context: Physician is asking about the standard of care for when a stent gets blocked again (re-occlusion).

Response approach:

"The older approach — balloon dilation plus another stent — often doesn't last long because the tumor tissue is still there. The current direction in IR:
RFA first to destroy the intraductal tumor
Then uncovered stent to preserve branch flow and allow future re-access

Meta-analyses show better stent patency AND survival with RFA + stent vs. stent alone, especially in hilar CCA. It's shifting from 'mechanical only' to 'ablative + mechanical.'

"This is a complex hilar CCA. I'm going percutaneous. Is ablation before stenting really worth it?"

Context: IR physician with a difficult case — multiple segmental ducts, going through the skin (percutaneous), considering whether to add RFA before stenting.

Response approach:

"In complex hilar CCA via percutaneous access, there's a growing trend toward ablation before stenting. The advantages:
Debulks the tumor inside the duct → improves the geometry of the lumen
Makes stent placement easier and more controlled
May prolong patency and reduce early re-occlusion

Uncovered stents remain the right choice in the hilum for branch preservation. Ablation just makes that strategy more durable."

"Does RFA really change patency or survival, or is it just extra work?"

Context: Skeptical physician who sees RFA as unnecessary added complexity.

Response approach: This is where the evidence speaks for itself:

"I understand the concern, doctor. Recent pooled data shows that RFA + stent vs. stent alone:
Improves overall survival
Improves stent patency, particularly in hilar strictures and cholangiocarcinoma
Does not significantly increase major complications when temperature-controlled systems (like ELRA) are used

That's why more centers now view RFA not as extra work, but as part of a more durable, oncologic-minded drainage strategy."

"Are we past the era of just uncovered stents in the hilum?"

Context: Physician questioning whether the field has moved beyond uncovered stents.

Response approach: This is STARMED's core message:

"We're not past uncovered stents — we're past 'stent alone' as the full strategy. Uncovered stents remain central because they preserve side-branch flow and allow re-intervention. What's new is combining them with ablation to:
• Improve the initial lumen
• Delay ingrowth-related re-occlusion
• Reduce how often the patient comes back

The modern IR approach: 'Ablation + Uncovered stent + functional drainage planning.' Not just 'pick a stent and hope it lasts.'"
Source: Role-play Scenarios (1st-Final v1, 2026); PMC11577465; doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07689-z

Reference (Taewoong) — Product Knowledge Library

The following content covers Taewoong Medical's products and procedures used outside STARMED America's direct sales. Included for product knowledge and physician conversations only.

Note: These products and approaches are NOT currently sold by STARMED America. This information is provided so sales reps can knowledgeably discuss the broader Taewoong portfolio when physicians ask about other stent models or endoscopic/EUS approaches.

ERCP Approach (GI)

Reference only

For GI physicians using endoscopic approach:

  • Standard duodenoscope (side-viewing) + fluoroscopy
  • Mouth → esophagus → stomach → duodenum
  • Cannulate papilla; inject contrast for cholangiogram
  • Guidewire across stricture → sphincterotomy if needed
  • Stent selection based on stricture length measurement
  • Deploy stent (B-prefix Niti-S for endoscopic approach)
Source: Training Rev.3 Slides 23-24, 43-44

EUS-Guided Approaches

Reference only
Approach Route Application
Hepaticogastrostomy Transgastric Intrahepatic biliary drainage (GioBor™ stent)
Choledochoduodenostomy Transduodenal Extrahepatic biliary drainage (easier access)
Rendezvous (ERCP+EUS) Combined Single-session BD with fewer complications
Source: Training Rev.3 Slides 45-47
PORTFOLIO REFERENCE The following Niti-S models are part of Taewoong Medical's global portfolio. They are NOT currently sold by STARMED America but are included here for product knowledge and physician conversations.

S Biliary Stent (Uncovered & Covered)

Portfolio only
  • Uncovered: Single nitinol wire braided structure. 7Fr delivery. For malignant strictures.
  • Covered: Silicone coated (inside + outside), retrieval string. 8–8.5Fr. For benign + malignant.
  • Diameter: 6, 8, 10mm | Length: 4–12cm
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 57–59

ComVi™ (Triple-layered)

Portfolio only
  • Triple layer: Nitinol → PTFE → Nitinol. D-type conformability + anti-ingrowth + anti-migration.
  • Isayama study: migration 2.1% (ComVi) vs 17% (Wallstent). 8Fr delivery.
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 62–65; Isayama, Surg Endosc 2009

LCD™ — for Hilar (Klatskin Tumors)

Portfolio only
  • Large Cell Design (6mm) — easy 2nd stent insertion through mesh. Strong radial force (#8 wire).
  • Ideal for bilateral stenting. No pre-dilation needed.
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 65–78

Bumpy™ (Covered) — for Benign Strictures

Portfolio only
  • Irregular cell → different segmental radial force. Fully covered (PTFE + silicone flared ends).
  • Retrieval string. 40% more expansion (new gen). ~70% biliary / ~30% pancreatic.
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 80–85

Other Global Models

Portfolio only
Model Application Key Feature
M Biliary Severe biliary obstruction S+D hybrid, 7Fr for tight strictures
GioBor™ EUS hepaticogastrostomy Half covered/uncovered, one-side flare
Kaffes™ Short covered stent Long platinum retrieval string
Nagi™ Anti-migration Large flared ends, full silicone cover
Source: Training Rev.3 Slide 79, 86–100

IR Market Reality — What You Need to Know

Field Intelligence

Understanding the IR market is critical for setting realistic expectations and choosing the right approach. Here's what 2 months of field analysis revealed:

Conservative
IR physicians adopt slowly
Relationship
Trust-based, not feature-based
Case-Driven
Proven cases > brochures
High Barrier
Equipment costs slow entry
  • IR is conservative and relationship-centered — decisions are based on trust built through clinical cases, not product demos
  • Hospital internal decision-making is slow — capital equipment purchase cycles can take 6–12 months
  • Growth appears slow but is normal — even Taewoong took years to establish its U.S. stent presence. STARMED's entry speed is healthy by IR standards
  • Equipment-based products face the highest barrier — this is why the ELRA-first strategy at thyroid hospitals is so powerful (see below)
What this means for you: Don't be discouraged by slow adoption. IR is a marathon, not a sprint. Focus on building 2–3 deep relationships per quarter rather than broad outreach. Each successful case generates referrals.
Source: Danny Kim Consulting Report (2-month field analysis, 2026)

Key Insight: Thyroid Equipment = ELRA Equipment

This is the single biggest opportunity for STARMED in IR.

If a hospital already has the VIVA combo generator for thyroid RFA, ELRA requires zero additional capital investment. The same generator powers both thyroid electrodes and ELRA biliary electrodes.

Priority targeting:
1. Hospitals where IR physicians perform thyroid RFA → they already have the VIVA combo
2. No equipment pitch needed — ELRA is a consumable add-on
3. Fastest path to first biliary case: "You already have everything you need"
Source: Danny Kim Consulting Report §8 — Market Structure Insights

ELRA-First Entry Strategy

The recommended market entry sequence based on field analysis:

Step Action Why It Works
1 Target thyroid VIVA combo hospitals first Zero equipment barrier — fastest to first case
2 Secure first ELRA biliary case One successful case = proof point for the account
3 Build case-based trust with follow-up IR physicians adopt through experience, not presentations
4 Introduce Niti-S stent after trust is established Stent needs no equipment — easy add once trust exists
5 Expand to package deal (ELRA + Stent) Bundle pricing locks in the account
For hospitals WITHOUT VIVA combo: Equipment pricing is the #1 barrier. Strategies include equipment price reduction bundled with accessory purchase commitments, or consumable bundle deals to offset upfront cost.
Source: Danny Kim Consulting Report §9 — Strategic Direction

Common Field Challenges & How to Overcome Them

Connecting product specs to real cases

Approach: Don't lead with features. Lead with: "What biliary cases are you seeing this month?" Then connect ELRA/stent specs to their actual patient scenarios.

Understanding hospital equipment ownership

Approach: Before your visit, find out: Does this hospital have a VIVA combo? Who owns it — IR or GI? If IR already has it for thyroid, ELRA is a zero-cost conversation.

Navigating IR/GI department dynamics

Approach: IR and GI often have different equipment sets and budgets. Know which department you're talking to and position accordingly. IR = percutaneous approach (T-prefix stents). GI = endoscopic approach (B-prefix stents).

Wide territory coverage

Approach: Prioritize depth over breadth. Focus on 3–5 high-potential accounts per quarter rather than trying to touch every hospital in your region. One converted account > 10 cold introductions.
Source: Danny Kim Consulting Report §5 — Field Challenges; §9 — Strategy

Market Entry Progress

Phase Description Status
Phase 1 Education & Setup βœ“ Complete
Phase 2 Messaging & Positioning βœ“ Complete
Phase 3 Customer Touchpoint Acquisition ● In Progress
Phase 4 Hospital Visits & Case Acquisition β—‹ Upcoming
Phase 5 Market Expansion β—‹ Future
Source: Danny Kim Consulting Report §10 — Phase Tracking
 
Welcome to the ELRA & Biliary Stent KB v1.0 🧠 Learning AI. Ask about products, procedures, clinical evidence, pricing (internal), competitive positioning, or reimbursement. Answers are powered by AI Assistant with File Search β€” the more you use it and provide feedback, the smarter it gets.
System | Biliary tract cleared indication only

Questions β€” Quality Pipeline

Every question is tracked. Mark helpful answers with πŸ‘. Unanswered questions can be resolved by adding an answer.

0
Total
0
Correct βœ…
0
Unanswered

Tip: click a card above to filter.

No questions asked yet.

Source Files — ELRA_Stent_KB + Training Rev.3

49 files across 6 categories + 1 comprehensive training deck (196 slides)